Not everyone carrying an axe is just a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Not likely, since most lumberjacks don’t generally carry their axes around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence took place in a village club in Fontaniva, Italy, in which a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some unsuspecting slots devices after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and movie websites that are streaming where people can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing off vapor, the device hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but maybe not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either this is a sign of victory, or a show of friendship towards these particular devices. Whenever dealing with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.
‘ He comes in here all the right time to try out the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a lot of money. He could be a laborer and only works any
now and then.’ Apparently, this really is one worker who keeps their equipment that is own handy.
‘He’s normally a really man that is quiet. He just wandered in really calmly with an axe and smashed all the machines. There were several customers by them at that time and additionally they were terrified,’ he added.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But prison overcrowding got him off with nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The 2nd of the two tales is just a bit more terrifying, since the axe was wielded maybe not during the slots, but at a member of the staff at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting store in Cardiff ‘in a state of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making off with some money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ employee with injury or worse if he didn’t comply.
A authorities spokesperson investigating the criminal activity stated that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s store at 9:30 pm on the night of the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant with all the tree-chopping weapon.
The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police described as a ‘quantity of money,’ while the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by a third suspect.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up in the scene.
Whose Casino Could It Be Anyhow? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
Whilst every and each of the three certification battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight over the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston mayoral candidate is threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposal that would put a casino in the neighboring town of Everett.
The appropriate choice is associated with the theory that neighboring communities would be suffering from casino projects, but won’t have to be able to vote on whether those casinos is opened in the beginning. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, has been one of the handful of applicants who have suggested that all of Boston should have the ability to vote on a casino that could be positioned in East Boston, as an example.
It is unfair to the surrounding communities when it comes to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote on. If the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based on the impact it would have on many Boston communities.
‘The Wynn proposal had been voted…on in only one community,’ Conley said during a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social get none of the proposed advantages.’
Based on the state laws that produced the opportunity for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually obtain a vote on whether or not to permit the projects to be built. However, casino designers are required to negotiate compensation, with arbitration needed if the casinos and governments that are localn’t come to a resolution by themselves.
Conley has proposed going for a path that is not actually outlined in the 2011 casino law in terms of the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being produced by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He could have the entire city of Boston vote on whether to accept the proposal, while still granting East Boston veto power over the vote that is entire. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
While Conley hasn’t specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal, a Boston Globe survey discovered that six for the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question had been in favor of it, with only two coming down against it (with Conley and an added candidate not answering the question). Meanwhile, four of ten candidates supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to simply East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents unearthed that 44% had been in support of the casino, while 37% opposed it.
No matter if voters back these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by their state because the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, additionally there is a contending proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken up to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the rising celebrity of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got their own hand caught in the sports book cookie container after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired premier recreations betting company CEO.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a betting store critic who has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nonetheless accepted the big donation from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing people of the Conservative Party to call out the shadow business secretary, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double requirements.
Since Gala Coral Group is certainly one of the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a number that is large of outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the united states- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign targeted at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the neighborhood roads of his London that is south Streatham, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a grip on the number of betting shops.’
‘I know there is certainly concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily filling up with betting shops and pay day loan organizations that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna says?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says one thing in public and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy appears to be limitless.’ And that is very uncommon for a politician.
Spared for a Technicality
Nevertheless, fighting back in the corner for the Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna reported that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in respect with the rules and precisely declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the workplace of Chuka Umunna in his capability as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, and for staffing,’ so it will officially pass as legitimate.
And while Goulden is no longer a relative head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group implies that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it is a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or perhaps not the Conservative Party may just be looking to ruin the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after using such a difficult stance royal vegas casino australia against the spread of the industry in their local constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he really believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ advertised Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is considered to be a future Labour Party leader, has recently experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this season their office ended up being accused of editing their Wikipedia page to show comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.